Splintered Shields

Shields in Dungeons & Dragons have always felt somewhat lackluster. I can appreciate that little boost they grant to my character’s Armor Class, but there’s always a part of me wants to cast the old board aside so I can irk out a little bit more damage with that trusty greatsword.

Nine years ago, Trollsmyth decided to give the shield some love with a little house rule called “Shields Shall be Splintered“. The rule is pretty simple: whenever you take damage, you can have your shield absorb the force of the blow. The shield is destroyed, but you ignore the damage.

The rule has gained a great deal of traction, specifically within the OSR side of the hobby. I’ve always been intrigued by the rule, so I thought I’d take a crack at adapting it to 5e. Here’s what I have.


When a character who is wielding a shield is hit by a successful attack roll, they can allow said shield to take the blunt of the damage. This grants the character resistance against this attack roll, but the shield is destroyed and the wielder loses the benefit it provides to their Armor Class. 

Characters who are wielding magical shields can use them in this way several times before they are destroyed. The number is equal to the magical shields’ additional bonus. Once they have exceeded this amount, the shield is destroyed. For example, a character with a +2 shield can perform the above action two times before it is destroyed. 

The biggest change I made to the rule is that it now offers resistance to the wielder instead of negating the damage. This feels a little bit more thematic to me, and I feel would work better with 5e. That being said, one can easily convert it back to a complete negation if they wish.

I also decided tried to create a simple solution for the magical shield situation. I figured allowing them to be more resilient would be an easy way to handle it, and keeping the number tied to their bonus meant it was straightforward to determine. I admit I haven’t figured out what to do for magical shields that don’t grant an additional bonus to Armor Class, but I can tackle that later down the road.

Therapeutic Role-Playing

Earlier this week, Kotaku released an article putting the spotlight on several therapy groups across the country that use Dungeons & Dragons to help children with social issues. The piece is a short, but interesting read. I highly recommend you give it a read by clicking the above link.

This article managed to inspire some thoughts of my own. Thoughts about how role-playing games have been a therapeutic outlet for myself, helping me deal with the troubles of everyday life. They’ve helped me come out of my own socially awkward shell, learn how to cooperate better with others, and become a better person.

I can’t count the times where I’ve used a session or made a character for a campaign to help myself work through an issue I was having in the real world, having no other outlet. They gave me a space to express myself, getting the problems that were causing me stress off my chest, and have fun while I was at it.

Furthermore, I think role-playing games have helped me be more empathetic towards others. Being able to take on a role that is vastly different than oneself, seeing what it feels like to live in another person’s shoes for a few hours every week, and deal with the struggles they are subject to can help expand your own views while also helping you learn a little more about yourself.

It’s also just nice to be able to exit reality for a evening every week, getting to put the hardships of life on the sidelines so you can enter another world, one where you get to have adventures with friends, and possibly become a hero in the process.

I’m sure I’m not the only one who has experienced the therapeutic elements of role-playing games. How have they helped you emotionally in the past?

Making Monstrous Items


In the Myth of Perseus, the titular hero killed the monstrous gorgon named Medusa, bringing her snake-covered head back to King Polydectes as a gift for a large banquet. Eventually, Perseus used the powers of the decapitated head to kill Polydectes once he learned about the man’s violent advances towards his mother Danae.

Similar situations occur within other myths. Tales depicting great heroes slaying various beasts, taking a part of said beast as a trophy or a gift for someone, then use that morbid item as a weapon (usually with mystical properties). Heck, there’s an entire video game franchise based around the concept: Monster Hunter.

Taking that into account, I think we can incorporate the idea into Dungeons & Dragons, allowing for the creation of a new kind of magic item: MONSTROUS ITEMS.

Unlike other magic items, monstrous items can take just about any form. They can be potions, wondrous items, weapons, etc. The only defining feature of a monstrous item is that it was made from the body parts (or fluids) of a particular creature. The item usually grants the wielder access to one of the base creature’s key abilities, but in a more limited fashion.

The key to creating a memorable monstrous item is similar to creating a memorable magic item: make sure the item is cool, yet thematic. For example, let’s continue to use Medusa’s Head as an example. The item allows you to utilize the creature’s petrification abilities, most likely by thrusting the head towards a creature, forcing them to look at it. Not only is the ability to possibly turn an enemy to stone cool, but it fits the flavor of the item.

I also suggest making monstrous items a rare sight within your campaign world. This will make acquiring one more special. It will also make encountering certain creatures more intriguing as well. You can explain the rarity away pretty easily due to the practice of turning the body part of a dead monster into an item could be seen as a little morbid, plus the magic needed to preserve the creature’s ability might be less common than other arcane skills.

Finally, I would also give these kind of items a weird cost or drawback. This might be my own preferences coming into play, but I find magic items that have a distinct quirk more interesting because they can lead to some cool moments within the story of the game. They also can make players think twice about using an item, possibly leading them to think of more inventive solutions to problems.

I’ll use the aforementioned Medusa’s Head as an example of what a monstrous item might look like mechanically:

MEDUSA’S HEAD (Monstrous Item, Rare; Requires Attunement) ~ This item appears to be the decapitated head of a maiden with a nest of vicious snakes as hair. The eyes and mouth upon the head seem to be shut tightly. You may use an action and point the head towards a creature within 30 feet that can see it. The eyes upon the head open wide, unleashing its cursed gaze, forcing the creature to make a DC 15 Constitution saving throw.

Creatures that fail the saving throw by 5 or more are instantly petrified. Otherwise, creatures that fail the save begin to turn to stone and are restrained. The restrained creature must repeat the saving throw at the end of its next turn, becoming petrified on a failure or ending the effect on a success. The petrification lasts until the creature is freed by the greater restoration spell or other magic.

You must be careful when wielding this item because if you are ever made to look at it while the head’s eyes are open, such as using it before a reflective surface, you will have to make the DC 15 Constitution saving throw as well. You can spend a bonus action to quickly advert your eyes, allowing you to avoid the saving throw, but suffer disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks until the beginning of your next turn.



Starfinder Iconics Revealed


The motley crew of the Starfinder universe

This past summer, Paizo announced they would be releasing the Starfinder Roleplaying Game, a science fantasy RPG based upon the Pathfinder rules. The game will launch at Gen Con 2017 with a Core Rulebook and a six-volume Adventure Path, as well as a Compatibility License for those wishing to make their own Starfinder content.

Paizo has steadily revealed information about Starfinder‘s mechanics, products, and setting over the past several months. Last Thursday, James L. Sutter decided to share Starfinder‘s cast of iconic characters, each capturing the core essence of one of the seven classes present within the game. Going clockwise from the leftmost character, we’ve got:

RAIA (LASHUNTA TECHNOMANCER) ~ The lashunta are a sexually-dimorphic race of telepaths. Technomancers are magical programmers who possess the ability to hack the laws of physics.

ISEPH (ANDROID OPERATIVE)Androids, as one would expect, are artificial beings. The operative is a class that relies upon stealth and skill. Think “space rogue”.

QUIG (YSOKI MECHANIC) ~ The ysoki are a race of hotheaded ratfolk. Mechanics are expert engineers who either build custom drones or use implanted AI.

OBOZAYA (VESK SOLDIER)The Vesk are powerful reptilian aliens, reminding me of the Klingons of Star Trek. Soldiers specialize in the art of combat, using heavy weapons and armor.

NAVASI (HUMAN ENVOY)Humans should require no explanation, mostly because I assume those reading this are human. Envoys use their wit and charm to help their allies or hinder their foes. They’re space bards.

KESKODAI (SHIRREN MYSTIC)Shirrens are an insectile race who freed themselves from a dangerous group known as the Swarm. Mystics channel the mysterious energies of the universe, similar to divine magic.

ALTRONUS (KASATHA SOLARIAN) ~ Kasathas are a race of four-armed beings who hail from a distant desert world. The solarians harness the energy of the stars and black holes, shaping them into armor or weapons. They kind of feel like Starfinder‘s jedi.

The first, and most obvious, element I noticed about Starfinder‘s group of iconics is the interesting lack of a human majority. Look at Pathfinder‘s iconics. The vast majority are some variety of human. Starfinder only has one representative of humanity: Navasi.

I rather like this because not only does it help separate this group from their fantasy counterparts, it also reflects the larger focus that Starfinder is placing upon non-human species. It also represents a nice example of the Cantina Effect, using the high density of strangeness within this image to help depict the kind of world this game exists within.

It also makes me really interested to see the actual mechanics behind these characters. For example, I’m dying to get my hands on the mechanic and the solarian. I also want to play an envoy so badly, but anybody who knows me shouldn’t be surprised by that. Bards are my favorite class, so I’d obviously love space bards just as much.

What about you? What do you think of Starfinder‘s iconics? Do you like, or do you hate them?

UPDATE: I have added links to the “Meet the Iconics” articles Paizo has been publishing on their own blog over the past couple of weeks.

The Art of the Unexpected – Improving Your Improv

The style of game mastery that I personally use at the table tends to heavily rely upon improvisation. This doesn’t mean I ignore preparation in favor of making everything up on the spot. I simply utilize a skill that I’ve developed over the decade or so that I’ve been running these kind of games, allowing me to not need as much preparation as I would otherwise.

Like any skill one might have, the ability to improvise behind the screen can be improved through practice. Today, I’ll present some advice on how to do this.

The first thing you should do to improve your improv capabilities is pretty straightforward: trust yourself. I know that sounds kind of corny, but that doesn’t make it any less true. You have to trust your abilities as a storyteller, believing that you will make logical decisions that will move the session forward, weaving a tale together with your friends. This is probably the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome to enhance your improv skills, but once you do, it will make everything else easier.

Secondly, prepare for the unexpected. This doesn’t mean you should try to prepare for every possibility that could even remotely happen during the game. That is an impossible endeavor. Instead, I’m suggesting you collect some “prop materials” you can utilize at a moment’s notice during a game. These are things like generic NPC stat blocks or pre-constructed encounters that you can re-tool on the fly to cover the majority of unexpected scenarios with very minimal effort.

The third piece of advice: remember to use”yes, and…” & “yes, but…”. One of the most important rules of improv is to always say yes to your partner, building upon their suggestion to further the scene. I suggest adopting a similar, yet slightly altered, version of this rule. When your players do something, try to respond with either “yes, and…” or “yes, but…” Build off their suggestions, incorporate them into the story of the session, make them feel like a part of the process. The trick is to make the continuation as logical as possible, making everything flow as naturally.

These are meant to be very broad suggestions to help you start improving your improvisational skills. I also suggest you remember to take extra notes during the session so you can actually remember what you created during it. I guarantee you will forget good chunks of it within a few minutes of the session’s end. Keeping notes is important regardless of whether you rely upon improv or not, but especially true if you do.

Do you have any improv tips or tricks of your own?


Remembering the Life of a Gamer

10401986_10207936509441765_3763950777436396812_nLast March, I lost a beloved friend by the name of Logan Masterson. This week marks the first anniversary of his passing.

In the grand scheme of things, Logan was only in my life for an incredibly short time. That being said, he undoubtedly left a strong mark upon it. He pushed me to start a particular passion project that I I hope to finish by the end of the year. He was there to help me when I felt the insufferable dick named Depression that lurks within the back of my head was trying to break me. He was also one of the best players I ever had at my table, always engaged, doing everything he could to create an interesting story, and always excited to play a new game. I was always happy to run a game for a group if I knew he’d be there.

Honestly, I don’t know where I’d be if I had never met this magnificent bastard with a beard that was almost as big as his heart two years ago.

I just wanted to take a moment to remember Logan, celebrating the friend that left such an impression upon me, one that I wish I could have spent more time with, but happy to have had him in my life at all. We all have those people who are gone, but we wish they could come back, even if it was just for another day, another hour, or another minute. Logan’s that friend for me. I wish he could come back for just one more session at the table, get one more chance to roll some dice with him, and tell a story we’d both remember.

I miss you, Logan. I know I’m not the only one. I will never forget you.

Thoughts on Alignment


“Alignment: Causing Moral Dilemmas since 1974”

There are three constants in life: death, taxes, and arguments about alignment.

Throughout the many editions of Dungeons & Dragons, the divisive nature of alignment has remained ever-present. It has sparked numerous debates both on- and offline, most of generally devolve into excessively loud diatribes about whether or not alignment should even exist as a rule within modern iterations of the system.

Tackling the topic of alignment is metaphorically similar to taking a stroll through an area filled to the brim with land mines: tread carefully or you’ll have a REALLY bad time. This is especially true if you have the sheer gall to admit that you actually kind of like alignment, like myself.

Don’t get me wrong, I understand why people despise it with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns. I might think that level of hate is incredibly excessive, but I understand why it exists, especially if the individual expressing that amount of hate describes a DM who viewed alignment as a prescriptive element. Forcing you to only take actions that fit within a rigidly defined box labelled “Lawful Good” or “Chaotic Neutral”, punishing you severely if you dare attempt to escape the straight-jacket they’ve forced you into, and this is doubly so if you decided to play a paladin in earlier editions.

I have empathy for players who have had to deal that kind of enforcement of alignment, but I feel we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater in this case. I think alignment can be useful when viewed as a descriptive thing, something that gives the player a broad idea of how this fictional character will generally act in any given situation. Not how they will always act, but what kind of action they will usually take in any given situation.

To put it simply, the alignment system works best as a set of guidelines than actual rules. Picture your character’s alignment as just another aspect of her personality, another tool in your arsenal to use when bringing her to life at the table, and help keep her behavior consistent. This doesn’t mean a character who happens to be Chaotic Good must always act in a way that is “Chaotic” or “Good”, but she will usually perceive the world through that lens, even when she occasionally acts “against” her alignment.

Now, I know what you are probably thinking. “That sounds like a wonderful approach, but how do you reconcile this with rules that allow you to detect alignment? How can you objectively detect something that is merely a philosophy? What about classes or features that require the character to maintain certain alignments or lose access to them?”

Those are all legitimate questions. In 5e, alignment seems to be less of an issue, but using this approach does create a wrinkle in earlier editions. The best way to iron out those are to simple have a short discussion with your group about how you will be handling alignment, figure out a way to justify those abilities/features, or simply remove them from the game entirely. Furthermore, you can treat alignment among mortal creatures differently than alignment among outsiders like angels or demons.

The key is to remain consistent, not to take the mechanic too seriously, and apply it with a gentle hand. At least, that’s how it has worked for me over the years.